Know what to fix in your ad, before you spend.

Upload your video or audio ad. AdZhi takes 52 measurements of the voice, visuals and script, scores them in 8 sections and one AdZhi Score, and turns them into fixes you can act on: re-record from 0:24 with more energy, lift the tone on the benefit, add proof before the ask.

Take the 5-step guided tour
skincare-ugc-v3.mp4sample report · 0:31 ad
The callTestStrong enough to put live and measure.
Fix firstRe-record the CTA. Vocal energy drops 32% at the ask — 0:24 of this 0:31 ad.
The score, section by section 8 sections · 0–100 · ring = 70
Teal fill = this ad · dashed ring = 70, a strong sectionWeakest section: Offer 13/100 · 57 below the 70 bar
Score by section vs the 70 line
SectionScore (/100)QualityThreshold
Hook82strong70
Call to action55fair70
Offer13weak70
Attention74strong70
Structure70strong70
Voice IQ81strong70
Alignment88strong70
Visuals & sound61fair70
  • First analysis free. No card.
  • Results in under a minute
  • No ad account required
  • Private to your account

Acoustic, visual and language signals, measured from the file itself. Ad platforms report none of them.

measurements read from each video ad
52
timestamped fixes, down to the second
0:24
of these in Meta or TikTok reporting
0
Before the spend

See what your audience actually experiences.

Targeting decides who sees your ad. The sound, voice and pacing decide whether they stay.

Slow build, weak closeCTA intensity 28/100

Persuasion intensity over the ad
TimeIntensity (/100)
0:0040
0:0452
0:1474
0:1980
0:2355
0:2928
0:3126

Dead zone 0:29–0:31 (2s). Persuasion collapses before the ask: the CTA lands after the viewer has checked out.

Persuasion peaks during the solution reveal around 62%, then collapses into the CTA dead zone.
Persuasion intensity across the ad, from the real sample report.
Watch it work

Upload it. Get the brief.
Then watch the loop close.

summer_hook_v3.mp4Reading the signal…

Click any step to explore

Run this on your own ad. Free →
The outcome

Every analysis ends in a decision.

Scale, test, fix or rework, with the evidence and ranked fixes behind it.

Measured
Vocal energy drops 32% at the call to action, at 0:24.
Recommended
Re-record it with a direct ask: “Tap the link and start tonight.”
Still to prove
Whether that lifts your CTR or ROAS. Log the result and AdZhi grades its own call.

Hand an ad, ad set or campaign to the agent. It never changes your ads or spend unless you switch live execution on.

The callTestNo critical flaws, and 68/100 is grade B (Good), clear of the 55 line.
  1. 1Re-record the CTA standing, with a direct ask: “Tap the link and start tonight.”
  2. 2Lift the pitch on “completely clear” — the benefit line stays flat where belief is won.
  3. 3Add one proof beat before the ask: your real review count, on screen, at ~13s.

From the sample report — read the full analysis →

The loop

Read the creative before the spend.
Then grade the forecast against reality.

Ad platforms report what already happened. AdZhi calls it from the creative first, then grades that forecast against your real numbers. The score is frozen before you spend.

Until a signal proves out on your account, it says so: directional, never proven.

Follow one ad all the way around the loop →
How it learns

Your ads teach it what works for you.

  1. SignalsWhat happens in the ad

    Pitch, energy, pace and pauses second by second, plus the words and sampled frames.

  2. MetricsThe same read for every ad

    The same scored sections for every ad, so any two compare like for like.

  3. ForecastFrozen before you spend

    Stored at analysis and never refit to the results that follow.

  4. Your modelWeighted to your results

    Weights shift from research norms towards what tracks your results.

When it starts learning from your results, and how it proves itself →

The proof

Proof, on your own numbers.

Your ads ranked by score, beside the ROAS each earned, with how often the ranking was right.

Sample dataWhat the proof view looks like — illustrative creatives, not a benchmark.

Two ads here beat their score and one high scorer under-delivers. That is what 75% looks like: a strong signal, not a perfect one.

Ranked correctly is how often the score put a pair of ads in the order their ROAS came in, not the share of ads that succeed. Eight ads demonstrate the view; they are not evidence the score generalises. ROAS also moves with audience, offer and spend, not only the creative.

Your proof

Higher AdZhi Scores, higher ROAS

AdZhi Score vs realised ROAS across 8 ads with logged outcomes
75%of ad pairs ranked correctly
+48%ROAS: top-quartile vs your average
  1. 88Spring Sale - Hook A3.10×
  2. 81Founder VO. Cold3.30×
  3. 74Creator demo 30s1.60×
  4. 69Problem-solution 15s2.40×
  5. 63Retargeting offer2.00×
  6. 57Lookalike. Broad1.80×
  7. 53Testimonial cutdown2.20×
  8. 48Weak CTA cut0.90×

Bars run to 3.30× · dashed = your average (2.16×) · solid = break-even (1.00×)

Ranked by AdZhi Score. Accuracy = how often it ordered a pair of your ads by realised ROAS correctly — association on your account, not a causal claim.

Trust & security

Encrypted, UK GDPR, DPA on request. From your first upload.

See how we protect your data →
AdZhi · Data handlingDPA on request
  • EncryptionIn transit and at rest. Turn retention off and uploads are deleted after analysis.
  • GovernanceUK GDPR, with a signable DPA on request.
  • Data boundaryNever shared with another advertiser. Benchmarks use pseudonymised aggregates only. Opt out of training any time.
  • IsolationA separate workspace, data and connections per client or brand.